ScreenTinkervssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ScreenTinker | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 53/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 7 in Digital Signage | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 242 | 114 271 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 523 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | v3.0.3 · 25 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 53/100 for ScreenTinker, so it is the safer default.
ScreenTinker ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, ScreenTinker is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 523 stars in 30 days).
ScreenTinker details →supabase details →
Swap a project
Keep ScreenTinker, compare it with
Keep supabase, compare it with