MikroDashvssupabase
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MikroDash | supabase | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 92/100 |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 40 in Database Management |
| GitHub stars | 633 | 114 285 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +3 537 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 8 |
| Latest release | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.26.08 · 7 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
supabase scores 92/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
MikroDash ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 8 for supabase.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; supabase needs more configuration.
supabase is growing faster right now (+3 537 stars in 30 days).
MikroDash details →supabase details →