MikroDashvsqdrant
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MikroDash | qdrant | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 5 in Vector Database |
| GitHub stars | 633 | 35 301 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +498 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 14 |
| Latest release | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 | v1.20.0 · 21 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
qdrant scores 82/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
qdrant ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for MikroDash.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; qdrant needs more configuration.
qdrant is growing faster right now (+498 stars in 30 days).
MikroDash details →qdrant details →