MikroDashvsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MikroDash | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 49/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #27 of 48 in Network Monitoring | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 633 | 393 343 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +2 919 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 10 | 37 |
| Latest release | v0.8.77 · 23 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 49/100 for MikroDash, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for MikroDash.
If you want the quickest setup, MikroDash is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 919 stars in 30 days).
MikroDash details →openclaw details →