Mesheryvsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Meshery | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 7 in Kubernetes | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 12 073 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +52 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.0.74 · 22 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Meshery scores 73/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
Meshery ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; Meshery needs more configuration.
Meshery is growing faster right now (+52 stars in 30 days).
Meshery details →qm-music details →
Swap a project
Keep Meshery, compare it with
Keep qm-music, compare it with