Argo CDvsqm-music
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Argo CD | qm-music | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 51/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 28 in CI/CD | #20 of 59 in Music Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 24 498 | 588 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +273 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 30 | 11 |
| Latest release | v3.3.18 · 22 Oct 2026 | v2.5.0 · 10 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Java |
Which one should you pick?
Argo CD scores 81/100 against 51/100 for qm-music, so it is the safer default.
Argo CD ships more often: 30 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for qm-music.
If you want the quickest setup, qm-music is easier to run; Argo CD needs more configuration.
Argo CD is growing faster right now (+273 stars in 30 days).
Argo CD details →qm-music details →