MeshCentralvsOTOBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MeshCentral | OTOBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 23 in Remote Access | #5 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 7 533 | 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +255 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 2 |
| Latest release | 1.3.1 · 23 Oct 2026 | rel-11_0_15 · 4 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
MeshCentral scores 74/100 against 54/100 for OTOBO, so it is the safer default.
MeshCentral ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OTOBO.
If you want the quickest setup, MeshCentral is easier to run; OTOBO needs more configuration.
MeshCentral is growing faster right now (+255 stars in 30 days).
MeshCentral details →OTOBO details →
Swap a project
Keep MeshCentral, compare it with
Keep OTOBO, compare it with