jumpservervsOTOBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| jumpserver | OTOBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 77/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 19 in Identity & Auth | #5 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 31 846 | 338 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +254 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 2 |
| Latest release | v3.10.24 · 27 Oct 2026 | rel-11_0_15 · 4 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
jumpserver scores 77/100 against 54/100 for OTOBO, so it is the safer default.
jumpserver ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OTOBO.
If you want the quickest setup, jumpserver is easier to run; OTOBO needs more configuration.
jumpserver is growing faster right now (+254 stars in 30 days).
jumpserver details →OTOBO details →