MediaCMSvsTITAN
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | TITAN | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 40/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #167 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 5 172 | 19 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 12 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v8.0.0 · 16 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
MediaCMS scores 67/100 against 40/100 for TITAN, so it is the safer default.
MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 12 for TITAN.
MediaCMS is growing faster right now (+47 stars in 30 days).
MediaCMS details →TITAN details →