MediaCMSvsSuper Productivity
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | Super Productivity | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 34 in Task Management |
| GitHub stars | 5 170 | 23 233 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +47 | +1 012 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 22 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | v19.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
Super Productivity scores 83/100 against 67/100 for MediaCMS, so it is the safer default.
MediaCMS ships more often: 26 stable releases in the past year, against 22 for Super Productivity.
If you want the quickest setup, Super Productivity is easier to run; MediaCMS needs more configuration.
Super Productivity is growing faster right now (+1 012 stars in 30 days).
MediaCMS details →Super Productivity details →