MediaCMSvsqBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MediaCMS | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 67/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 7 in Torrent |
| GitHub stars | 5 170 | 1 759 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +45 | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 26 | 52 |
| Latest release | v9.4.0 · 26 Oct 2026 | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
MediaCMS and qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) score the same (67/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 26 for MediaCMS.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; MediaCMS needs more configuration.
MediaCMS is growing faster right now (+45 stars in 30 days).
MediaCMS details →qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →