hostingvsqBittorrent (LinuxServer.io)
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| hosting | qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 27/100 | 67/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 3 in Video Hosting | #1 of 7 in Torrent |
| GitHub stars | 11 | 1 759 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +22 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 52 |
| Latest release | — | 5.3.0_v2.1.2-ls485 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Dockerfile |
Which one should you pick?
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) scores 67/100 against 27/100 for hosting, so it is the safer default.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) ships more often: 52 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for hosting.
If you want the quickest setup, qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is easier to run; hosting needs more configuration.
qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) is growing faster right now (+22 stars in 30 days).
hosting details →qBittorrent (LinuxServer.io) details →