WeChat Markdown EditorvsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| WeChat Markdown Editor | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #7 of 81 in Notes & Editors | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 13 481 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +33 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 0 | 10 |
| Latest release | — | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | WTFPL | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
WeChat Markdown Editor scores 71/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Wildbox ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for WeChat Markdown Editor.
If you want the quickest setup, WeChat Markdown Editor is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
WeChat Markdown Editor is growing faster right now (+33 stars in 30 days).
WeChat Markdown Editor details →Wildbox details →
Swap a project
Keep WeChat Markdown Editor, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with