MatomovsWorld Monitor
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Matomo | World Monitor | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #5 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 21 985 | 89 717 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +92 | +2 428 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 | 17 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.11.6 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
World Monitor scores 86/100 against 74/100 for Matomo, so it is the safer default.
Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for World Monitor.
If you want the quickest setup, Matomo is easier to run; World Monitor needs more configuration.
World Monitor is growing faster right now (+2 428 stars in 30 days).
Matomo details →World Monitor details →
Swap a project
Keep Matomo, compare it with
Keep World Monitor, compare it with