MatomovsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Matomo | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 74/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 21 in Web analytics | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 21 985 | 47 725 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +91 | +18 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 41 | 10 |
| Latest release | 6.0.0-b9.20261028180522 · 28 Oct 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | PHP | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Text Generation WebUI scores 76/100 against 74/100 for Matomo, so it is the safer default.
Matomo ships more often: 41 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Text Generation WebUI.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Matomo needs more configuration.
Matomo is growing faster right now (+91 stars in 30 days).
Matomo details →Text Generation WebUI details →
Swap a project
Keep Matomo, compare it with
Keep Text Generation WebUI, compare it with