Plausible AnalyticsvsText Generation WebUI
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Plausible Analytics | Text Generation WebUI | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 76/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 21 in Web analytics | #6 of 69 in AI Chat |
| GitHub stars | 29 709 | 47 724 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +502 | +17 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 10 |
| Latest release | v3.2.1 · 1 Jun 2026 | v4.9 · 20 May 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Plausible Analytics scores 81/100 against 76/100 for Text Generation WebUI, so it is the safer default.
Text Generation WebUI ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for Plausible Analytics.
If you want the quickest setup, Text Generation WebUI is easier to run; Plausible Analytics needs more configuration.
Plausible Analytics is growing faster right now (+502 stars in 30 days).
Plausible Analytics details →Text Generation WebUI details →