MastodonvsUrocissa
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Mastodon | Urocissa | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 48/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums | #11 of 19 in Photo Galleries |
| GitHub stars | 50 456 | 300 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +137 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 38 | 18 |
| Latest release | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 | 3.4.2 · 21 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Ruby | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 48/100 for Urocissa, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 18 for Urocissa.
If you want the quickest setup, Urocissa is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
Mastodon is growing faster right now (+137 stars in 30 days).
Mastodon details →Urocissa details →