Martin Tile ServervsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Martin Tile Server | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 68/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 12 in Maps | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 4 031 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +90 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 45 | 10 |
| Latest release | python-cog-tiles-v0.1.1 · 22 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Rust | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Martin Tile Server scores 68/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Martin Tile Server ships more often: 45 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Wildbox.
If you want the quickest setup, Martin Tile Server is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
Martin Tile Server is growing faster right now (+90 stars in 30 days).
Martin Tile Server details →Wildbox details →
Swap a project
Keep Martin Tile Server, compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with