Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM)vsWildbox
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) | Wildbox | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 44/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 7 in Navigation | #56 of 78 in Security |
| GitHub stars | 8 178 | 134 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +75 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 16 | 10 |
| Latest release | v26.10.0 · 1 Oct 2026 | v0.12.2 · 6 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | BSD-2-Clause | MIT |
| Main language | C++ | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) scores 71/100 against 44/100 for Wildbox, so it is the safer default.
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) ships more often: 16 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Wildbox.
If you want the quickest setup, Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is easier to run; Wildbox needs more configuration.
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) is growing faster right now (+75 stars in 30 days).
Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM) details →Wildbox details →
Swap a project
Keep Open Source Routing Machine (OSRM), compare it with
Keep Wildbox, compare it with