MakersVaultvsMastodon
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| MakersVault | Mastodon | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 45/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #26 of 34 in File Management | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 252 | 50 458 |
| Stars, last 30 days | — | +139 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 38 |
| Latest release | v5 · 1 Jan 2026 | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 45/100 for MakersVault, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for MakersVault.
If you want the quickest setup, MakersVault is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
Mastodon is growing faster right now (+139 stars in 30 days).
MakersVault details →Mastodon details →
Swap a project
Keep MakersVault, compare it with
Keep Mastodon, compare it with