copypartyvsMastodon
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Mastodon | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 47 163 | 50 457 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +390 | +138 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 38 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | v4.4.26 · 1 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty and Mastodon score the same (82/100), so the choice comes down to the details below.
Mastodon ships more often: 38 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for copyparty.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+390 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Mastodon details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Mastodon, compare it with