LXDvsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LXD | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 70/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #3 of 15 in Virtualization | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 4 844 | 46 459 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +13 | +1 324 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 5 |
| Latest release | lxd-6.10.1 · 28 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 70/100 for LXD, so it is the safer default.
LXD ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
If you want the quickest setup, LXD is easier to run; mitmproxy needs more configuration.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 324 stars in 30 days).
LXD details →mitmproxy details →
Swap a project
Keep LXD, compare it with
Keep mitmproxy, compare it with