e2bvsmitmproxy
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| e2b | mitmproxy | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 76/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #14 of 209 in AI Agents | #1 of 48 in Network Monitoring |
| GitHub stars | 14 597 | 46 462 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +659 | +1 327 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 76 | 5 |
| Latest release | @e2b/code-interpreter-python@2.11.6 · 28 Oct 2026 | v12.3.1 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Python |
Which one should you pick?
mitmproxy scores 86/100 against 76/100 for e2b, so it is the safer default.
e2b ships more often: 76 stable releases in the past year, against 5 for mitmproxy.
mitmproxy is growing faster right now (+1 327 stars in 30 days).
e2b details →mitmproxy details →