LubeLoggervsTailscale
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | Tailscale | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 84/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 56 in VPN |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 38 263 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +1 421 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 14 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.104.4 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | BSD-3-Clause |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Tailscale scores 84/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 14 for Tailscale.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Tailscale needs more configuration.
Tailscale is growing faster right now (+1 421 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →Tailscale details →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep Tailscale, compare it with