LubeLoggervsStash
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | Stash | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #2 of 142 in Media Management |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 13 311 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +301 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 7 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
Stash is growing faster right now (+301 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →Stash details →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep Stash, compare it with