LubeLoggervsStalwart Mail Server
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | Stalwart Mail Server | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 78/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #2 of 16 in Mail Server |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 15 465 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +70 | +681 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 31 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v1.0.1 · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0-only AND LicenseRef-SEL |
| Main language | JavaScript | Rust |
Which one should you pick?
Stalwart Mail Server scores 78/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
Stalwart Mail Server ships more often: 31 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Stalwart Mail Server needs more configuration.
Stalwart Mail Server is growing faster right now (+681 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →Stalwart Mail Server details →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep Stalwart Mail Server, compare it with