LubeLoggervssdnext
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | sdnext | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 71/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #3 of 11 in Image Generation |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 7 362 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +16 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
sdnext scores 71/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for sdnext.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; sdnext needs more configuration.
LubeLogger is growing faster right now (+69 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →sdnext details →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep sdnext, compare it with