LubeLoggervsOpenWrt
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | OpenWrt | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 83/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 8 in Operating System |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 28 969 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +456 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 10 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v25.12.6 · 18 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | C |
Which one should you pick?
OpenWrt scores 83/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for OpenWrt.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; OpenWrt needs more configuration.
OpenWrt is growing faster right now (+456 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →OpenWrt details →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep OpenWrt, compare it with