LubeLoggervsopenclaw
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | openclaw | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 93/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 124 in AI |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 393 335 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +2 911 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 37 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v2026.10.8 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
openclaw scores 93/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
openclaw ships more often: 37 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; openclaw needs more configuration.
openclaw is growing faster right now (+2 911 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →openclaw details →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep openclaw, compare it with