LubeLoggervsnocodb
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | nocodb | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 81/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #1 of 4 in No-code Platforms |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 65 374 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +70 | +320 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 15 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | 2026.10.0 · 23 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | Other |
| Main language | JavaScript | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
nocodb scores 81/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
LubeLogger ships more often: 17 stable releases in the past year, against 15 for nocodb.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; nocodb needs more configuration.
nocodb is growing faster right now (+320 stars in 30 days).
LubeLogger details →nocodb details →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep nocodb, compare it with