LubeLoggervsMastodon
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LubeLogger | Mastodon | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 65/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 5 in Vehicle Management | #2 of 69 in Social Networks & Forums |
| GitHub stars | 2 926 | 50 457 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +69 | +137 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 17 | 42 |
| Latest release | v1.7.4 · 14 Oct 2026 | v4.4.27 · 29 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Ruby |
Which one should you pick?
Mastodon scores 82/100 against 65/100 for LubeLogger, so it is the safer default.
Mastodon ships more often: 42 stable releases in the past year, against 17 for LubeLogger.
If you want the quickest setup, LubeLogger is easier to run; Mastodon needs more configuration.
LubeLogger details →Mastodon details →
Swap a project
Keep LubeLogger, compare it with
Keep Mastodon, compare it with