Grafana LokivsOTOBO
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Grafana Loki | OTOBO | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 81/100 | 54/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 8 in Logging | #5 of 9 in Helpdesk |
| GitHub stars | 29 093 | 340 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +150 | +2 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 21 | 2 |
| Latest release | v3.7.9 · 20 Oct 2026 | rel-11_0_15 · 4 Feb 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | Perl |
Which one should you pick?
Grafana Loki scores 81/100 against 54/100 for OTOBO, so it is the safer default.
Grafana Loki ships more often: 21 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for OTOBO.
If you want the quickest setup, Grafana Loki is easier to run; OTOBO needs more configuration.
Grafana Loki is growing faster right now (+150 stars in 30 days).
Grafana Loki details →OTOBO details →
Swap a project
Keep Grafana Loki, compare it with
Keep OTOBO, compare it with