Locustvsuptime-kuma
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Locust | uptime-kuma | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 88/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 10 in Testing | #3 of 104 in Monitoring & observability |
| GitHub stars | 28 246 | 93 036 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +68 | +1 289 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 20 | 19 |
| Latest release | 2.47.0 · 21 Oct 2026 | 2.5.8 · 26 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
uptime-kuma scores 88/100 against 78/100 for Locust, so it is the safer default.
Locust ships more often: 20 stable releases in the past year, against 19 for uptime-kuma.
uptime-kuma is growing faster right now (+1 289 stars in 30 days).
Locust details →uptime-kuma details →
Swap a project
Keep Locust, compare it with
Keep uptime-kuma, compare it with