livekitvsTurtl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | Turtl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #47 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 21 915 | 631 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +816 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 0 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | — |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
livekit scores 80/100 against 47/100 for Turtl, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Turtl.
If you want the quickest setup, Turtl is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
livekit is growing faster right now (+816 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →Turtl details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep Turtl, compare it with