StashvsTurtl
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stash | Turtl | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 47/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #47 of 81 in Notes & Editors |
| GitHub stars | 13 313 | 631 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +303 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 0 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | — |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | AGPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Go | JavaScript |
Which one should you pick?
Stash scores 78/100 against 47/100 for Turtl, so it is the safer default.
Stash ships more often: 7 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Turtl.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; Turtl needs more configuration.
Stash is growing faster right now (+303 stars in 30 days).
Stash details →Turtl details →