livekitvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| livekit | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 80/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 118 in Media Server | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 21 891 | 117 704 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +816 | +5 345 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 11 |
| Latest release | v1.13.11 · 25 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | Apache-2.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 80/100 for livekit, so it is the safer default.
livekit ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, TradingAgents is easier to run; livekit needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 345 stars in 30 days).
livekit details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep livekit, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with