AudiobookshelfvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Audiobookshelf | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 15 in Audiobook Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 14 829 | 117 655 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +409 | +5 296 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 14 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.37.2 · 23 Oct 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | GPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | JavaScript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 79/100 for Audiobookshelf, so it is the safer default.
Audiobookshelf ships more often: 14 stable releases in the past year, against 11 for TradingAgents.
If you want the quickest setup, Audiobookshelf is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 296 stars in 30 days).
Audiobookshelf details →TradingAgents details →
Swap a project
Keep Audiobookshelf, compare it with
Keep TradingAgents, compare it with