StashvsTradingAgents
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Stash | TradingAgents | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 86/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 142 in Media Management | #4 of 209 in AI Agents |
| GitHub stars | 13 306 | 117 655 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +300 | +5 296 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 7 | 11 |
| Latest release | latest_develop · 24 Jun 2026 | v0.7.1 · 27 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | Apache-2.0 |
| Main language | Go | Python |
Which one should you pick?
TradingAgents scores 86/100 against 78/100 for Stash, so it is the safer default.
TradingAgents ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 7 for Stash.
If you want the quickest setup, Stash is easier to run; TradingAgents needs more configuration.
TradingAgents is growing faster right now (+5 296 stars in 30 days).
Stash details →TradingAgents details →