LivebookvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Livebook | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 69/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 3 in Data Science | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 5 897 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +25 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 6 |
| Latest release | v0.19.10 · 17 Sept 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | Apache-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Elixir | Python |
Which one should you pick?
Tube Archivist scores 72/100 against 69/100 for Livebook, so it is the safer default.
Livebook ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, Livebook is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
Tube Archivist is growing faster right now (+84 stars in 30 days).
Livebook details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep Livebook, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with