JupyterLabvsTube Archivist
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| JupyterLab | Tube Archivist | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 78/100 | 72/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 3 in Data Science | #7 of 118 in Media Server |
| GitHub stars | 15 380 | 8 553 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +60 | +84 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 13 | 6 |
| Latest release | v4.6.5 · 29 Oct 2026 | v0.6.0 · 25 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Easy | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | BSD-3-Clause | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Python |
Which one should you pick?
JupyterLab scores 78/100 against 72/100 for Tube Archivist, so it is the safer default.
JupyterLab ships more often: 13 stable releases in the past year, against 6 for Tube Archivist.
If you want the quickest setup, JupyterLab is easier to run; Tube Archivist needs more configuration.
JupyterLab details →Tube Archivist details →
Swap a project
Keep JupyterLab, compare it with
Keep Tube Archivist, compare it with