Liquidsoapvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Liquidsoap | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 62/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #8 of 54 in Media Streaming | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 1 742 | 24 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +0 | +771 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 9 | 11 |
| Latest release | rolling-release-v2.5.x · 28 Oct 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | OCaml | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 62/100 for Liquidsoap, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Liquidsoap.
temporal is growing faster right now (+771 stars in 30 days).
Liquidsoap details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep Liquidsoap, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with