copypartyvsLiquidsoap
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| copyparty | Liquidsoap | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 82/100 | 62/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 86 in File Sharing | #9 of 54 in Media Streaming |
| GitHub stars | 47 168 | 1 742 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +395 | — |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 19 | 9 |
| Latest release | v1.20.26 · 14 Oct 2026 | rolling-release-v2.5.x · 28 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Python | OCaml |
Which one should you pick?
copyparty scores 82/100 against 62/100 for Liquidsoap, so it is the safer default.
copyparty ships more often: 19 stable releases in the past year, against 9 for Liquidsoap.
If you want the quickest setup, copyparty is easier to run; Liquidsoap needs more configuration.
copyparty is growing faster right now (+395 stars in 30 days).
copyparty details →Liquidsoap details →
Swap a project
Keep copyparty, compare it with
Keep Liquidsoap, compare it with