LinuxCNCvstemporal
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LinuxCNC | temporal | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 82/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #1 of 1 in Workflow |
| GitHub stars | 2 513 | 24 049 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +771 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 11 |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | v1.30.8 · 12 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-2.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Go |
Which one should you pick?
temporal scores 82/100 against 64/100 for LinuxCNC, so it is the safer default.
temporal ships more often: 11 stable releases in the past year, against 3 for LinuxCNC.
temporal is growing faster right now (+771 stars in 30 days).
LinuxCNC details →temporal details →
Swap a project
Keep LinuxCNC, compare it with
Keep temporal, compare it with