LinuxCNCvsryot
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LinuxCNC | ryot | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 64/100 | 63/100 |
| Rank in category | #1 of 4 in Industrial IoT | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 2 513 | 3 648 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +12 | +42 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 3 | 2 |
| Latest release | v2.9.10 · 3 Jul 2026 | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 |
| Setup | Advanced | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | No |
| License | GPL-2.0 | GPL-3.0 |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
LinuxCNC scores 64/100 against 63/100 for ryot, so it is the safer default.
LinuxCNC ships more often: 3 stable releases in the past year, against 2 for ryot.
If you want the quickest setup, ryot is easier to run; LinuxCNC needs more configuration.
ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
LinuxCNC details →ryot details →
Swap a project
Keep LinuxCNC, compare it with
Keep ryot, compare it with