ryotvsScada-LTS
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| ryot | Scada-LTS | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 63/100 | 56/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 11 in Fitness Tracker | #2 of 4 in Industrial IoT |
| GitHub stars | 3 648 | 1 019 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +42 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 2 | 0 |
| Latest release | v10.5.0 · 22 Aug 2026 | — |
| Setup | Moderate | Moderate |
| Official Docker image | No | Yes |
| License | GPL-3.0 | GPL-2.0 |
| Main language | Typescript | Java |
Which one should you pick?
ryot scores 63/100 against 56/100 for Scada-LTS, so it is the safer default.
ryot ships more often: 2 stable releases in the past year, against 0 for Scada-LTS.
ryot is growing faster right now (+42 stars in 30 days).
ryot details →Scada-LTS details →
Swap a project
Keep ryot, compare it with
Keep Scada-LTS, compare it with