LinkWardenvsYarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LinkWarden | Yarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing | #7 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 20 262 | 4 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +425 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 4 |
| Latest release | v2.16.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v2.9 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Go |
Which one should you pick?
LinkWarden scores 79/100 against 61/100 for Yarr, so it is the safer default.
LinkWarden ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 4 for Yarr.
If you want the quickest setup, Yarr is easier to run; LinkWarden needs more configuration.
LinkWarden is growing faster right now (+425 stars in 30 days).
LinkWarden details →Yarr details →
Swap a project
Keep LinkWarden, compare it with
Keep Yarr, compare it with