WallabagvsYarr
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Wallabag | Yarr | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing | #7 of 85 in Feed Reader |
| GitHub stars | 13 034 | 4 080 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +51 | +28 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 4 |
| Latest release | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 | v2.9 · 7 Sept 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Go |
Which one should you pick?
Wallabag scores 73/100 against 61/100 for Yarr, so it is the safer default.
Yarr ships more often: 4 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wallabag.
If you want the quickest setup, Yarr is easier to run; Wallabag needs more configuration.
Wallabag details →Yarr details →
Swap a project
Keep Wallabag, compare it with
Keep Yarr, compare it with