LinkWardenvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| LinkWarden | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 79/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 20 261 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +424 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 10 |
| Latest release | v2.16.3 · 9 Sept 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | AGPL-3.0 | MIT |
| Main language | Typescript | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
LinkWarden scores 79/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
LinkWarden ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 10 for Windows ARM.
If you want the quickest setup, LinkWarden is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
LinkWarden is growing faster right now (+424 stars in 30 days).
LinkWarden details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep LinkWarden, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with