WallabagvsWindows ARM
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| Wallabag | Windows ARM | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 73/100 | 61/100 |
| Rank in category | #4 of 46 in Bookmarks & Link Sharing | #7 of 15 in Virtualization |
| GitHub stars | 13 034 | 2 260 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +51 | +0 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 1 | 10 |
| Latest release | 2.6.15 · 28 Oct 2026 | v6.06 · 5 Oct 2026 |
| Setup | Moderate | Advanced |
| Official Docker image | Yes | Yes |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | PHP | Batchfile |
Which one should you pick?
Wallabag scores 73/100 against 61/100 for Windows ARM, so it is the safer default.
Windows ARM ships more often: 10 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Wallabag.
If you want the quickest setup, Wallabag is easier to run; Windows ARM needs more configuration.
Wallabag is growing faster right now (+51 stars in 30 days).
Wallabag details →Windows ARM details →
Swap a project
Keep Wallabag, compare it with
Keep Windows ARM, compare it with