librephotosvsWorkout.cool
Two self-hosted projects, compared on the numbers selfhost.directory tracks live: score, popularity, release cadence and setup effort.
| librephotos | Workout.cool | |
|---|---|---|
| Score | 71/100 | 66/100 |
| Rank in category | #2 of 41 in Photo Management | #2 of 11 in Fitness Tracker |
| GitHub stars | 8 118 | 8 651 |
| Stars, last 30 days | +35 | +156 |
| Stable releases, 12 months | 12 | 1 |
| Latest release | windows-wheels-2026.10.22 · 22 Oct 2026 | v1.3.2 · 7 Dec 2025 |
| Setup | Moderate | Easy |
| Official Docker image | Yes | No |
| License | MIT | MIT |
| Main language | Python | Typescript |
Which one should you pick?
librephotos scores 71/100 against 66/100 for Workout.cool, so it is the safer default.
librephotos ships more often: 12 stable releases in the past year, against 1 for Workout.cool.
If you want the quickest setup, Workout.cool is easier to run; librephotos needs more configuration.
Workout.cool is growing faster right now (+156 stars in 30 days).
librephotos details →Workout.cool details →
Swap a project
Keep librephotos, compare it with
Keep Workout.cool, compare it with